Manohar: Lalit Modi Trying to Defame Image of BCCI, Chirayu Amin; Is Culpable Himself

--> -->

Sreelata YellamrazuJun 5 2010

Lalit Modi has suddenly become rampant across television channels, making suggestions that the interim IPL Chairman is not above board while giving clean chit to Sharad Pawar. However, the BCCI President says that the suspended IPL Chairman and Commissioner has a lot of explanation to do himself.

chirayu amin 2 ap

The battle rages on with Modi trying to get into the public limelight with comments he thinks are enough to create a few ripples. But the BCCI is standing its ground and even suggesting it is Modi who tried to twist the situation and has still to come clean.

Modi has alleged in a television interview that Sharad Pawar was not part of the bid for the Pune team in the IPL although Pawar family does have a stake in the company that made the bid with Anuriddha Deshpande taking the lead. But Modi lashed out at Chirayu Amin saying that the interim IPL Chairman was himself a part of the Pune bid. However, while Amin himself stated that he had first put his intentions in front of the BCCI and there was "transparency" about it, the BCCI President, Shashank Manohar, has claimed that it was Modi himself who invited Amin to bid with the consortium.

Modi says that there was much happening behind the scenes while Manohar failed to throw light on and his battle with N. Srinivasan was no hidden matter.

This is what Manohar said in a public release:

Mr Modi, since yesterday is trying to malign the image of the Board and Mr. Chirayu Amin by making statements which are far from the truth.

"I did not react earlier when he made allegations against me and the Hony. Secretary as I did not wish to dignify his ridiculous allegations with a repartee. Today I am replying, because he is trying to tarnish the image of the Board and its members.

"It is alleged by Mr Modi, that Mr Amin had given a bid along with the Pune Franchisee – City Corporation Ltd. He has further alleged that I did not inform him about the letter from Mr. Amin seeking permission to bid and that the said communication was suppressed from him and the Governing Council Members.

"The truth is that it was Mr Modi himself who sent a message to the Pune Franchisees through Mr Ajay Shirke, President, MCA, asking them to contact Mr. Amin and ask him to be a part of the Consortium.

When the Pune Franchisee approached Mr. Amin to join their Consortium, he informed them that he might join the Consortium by making an investment of upto 10 %. Mr. Amin had then given me a letter with a copy to the Hony Secretary, informing that he has been approached by the Pune Franchisee. In his letter he clearly states that should City Corporation Ltd win the bid, he would then formally approach the Board for a sanction to invest in the Consortium. The letter itself makes it very clear that it was a proposal with a pre-condition attached- that Mr Amin would seek a formal sanction only in case the bid succeeds.

"The Board and the Governing Council would have needed to consider Mr Amins case only if and when he put forward a concrete proposal to invest.

"First and foremost, Mr Amin's letter was not for asking permission to bid. Secondly, he was not a bidder with City Corporation Ltd and this even Mr Modi has agreed in his interview.

It is thus clear that the claim of Mr Modi that Mr Amin was a bidder is misleading and is only to malign the image of the Board and it Members.

"Mr Modi has also made a statement that Mr Aniruddha Deshpande,MD City Corporation Ltd, had informed him that though the bid was submitted on behalf of City Corporation Ltd, it was in fact a personal bid on behalf of himself. Mr Modi , who claims to be above board in all matters, did not think this very cogent and important piece of information should be shared with Governing Council Members /Officials. His statement becomes even more questionable in the light of the fact that the bid document tendered on behalf of City Corporation Ltd gives information only regarding City Corporation Ltd and does not give any personal information about Mr Aniruddha Deshpande. The bid could have been rejected at the threshold if it had been from Mr Aniruddha Deshpande ,in his individual capacity, as it did not carry the necessary information about the bidder, ie. Mr Deshpande.

"Mr. Modi, who is himself in the dock, is trying to tarnish the image of the Board by making false and misleading statements time and again when as a fact the Board has landed in this embarrassing situation due to his own misdeeds.

"The reason for me releasing this statement is that the BCCI is an Institution which is the best run Sports Body in the country and the image of BCCI cannot be allowed to be tarnished by people like Mr Lalit Modi."

Fresh off the IPL: Pawar Family Denies Support as Shareholder in IPL Team Bid

Modi Says, IPL is Clean of Matchfixing; Allegations Motivated

Clarke gets Defamation Letter from Modi

Modi's Defense: Counties Contacted Him for an ECB Supported IPL Style League

Even as Lalit Modi Gets Ready to Reply to 2nd Showcause Notice; BCCI Slaps a Third

Srinivasan Quips to Modi’s “Leaking” Habit

Modi Wants Independent Probe; Wants Manohar to be Cross Examined; Srinivasan Off It

IMG Files Suit Against ECB Boss Even as BCCI Plans to Meet IMG Officials

Modi's Lawyer Mehmood Abdi Submits Documents to BCCI; Tells Media, Time to Drop Charges

Relaxed Modi Revels in Monaco as Mark Webber Wins the Monaco Grand Prix

Pataudi: Decision to Increase IPL 4 Teams, IPL 4 Schedule Not Unanimous

Counties Led to Talks with Modi After Test Match Bidding Policy Failed